The Toxicity of RSE
The teaching of any Relationships and Sexuality Education for primary and secondary schools needs an entire rethink. There are broad ranging and fundamental issues with the entire process, which are outlined below.
Author: Retired School Teacher, County Antrim
When a child develops a trust in their teacher(s), they will accept what he/she tells them as right and true. If the teacher says it, then it must be right.
Key Stage 1 children are very dependent on their teacher or classroom assistant. They expect him/her to protect and comfort them. A teacher is in a position of “in loco parentis”, meaning they are in place of the parents while the child is at school. At this Key Stage 1 some, not all, still require help with toileting.
This is why all teachers and staff closely involved with children must be vetted through Access NI to prevent any child being abused. In addition to this, referees for staff are sought to make sure the person is fit, law abiding, and with the right experience and character.
The current CCEA RSE curriculum content being presented makes the teacher abuse the child's innocence
The teacher will be expected to present sexual topics that destroy the child's mind by adding ideas and actions which form their thinking
The teacher is a trusted person in the child's eyes therefore he/she will be presenting sinful practices as acceptable
The teacher will also be asked to present this curriculum without the parent’s knowledge or permission, causing a breach of trust in the relationship between teacher and parents
As the child becomes older, the teaching about beliefs and morals being received in school versus that taught in the home and church will come into conflict and may cause the child to rebel against the values of the home/family/church. The child will increasingly question and refuse to heed the good advice of their parents in favour of the immoral teaching they receive at school. This may well lead to secrecy by the older child until they act on the error they have been taught and seriously damage their lives.
This is the scenario that we face ahead of us.
Heaton-Harris's RSE proposals destroy the minds of both the child and the teacher. How can a teacher present these vile ideas and not be corrupted by what he/she teaches? The child may well become precocious (know about sexual information that would only be known by an older, worldly-wise child). The child will act on this new information with other children and corrupt them. If a child is exposed to this type of learning, he or she will continue in this reinforced behaviour and corruption will spread like an epidemic throughout every social contact.
The need for age-appropriate, parent-led RSE in the home
Parents have concerns with RSE classroom teaching because:
Parents know their child best, and want to protect their child's innocence
Due to the child's personality, he/she will react differently to what he/she is told
Information that is presented to a child, which is not linked to their developmental age, will create confusion and anxiety. Parents understand their child's ability to cope with information
A child presented with information, when they are not emotionally able to cope with it, can develop behavioural problems such as crying and tantrums because they cannot always describe their feelings (this can cause problems in school and at home)
Parents know what level of understanding their child has mastered
Parents know that what children want is not always good for their wellbeing
Children need to be taught about acceptable behaviour, rules and boundaries. Parents are the best people to establish them. What is considered as age-appropriate RSE will lead to children acting out what they've been shown on other children
Parents know that children do not know the difference between good and bad secrets, and would not wish their child to be confused in this way
Parents would not wish others to have the power to confuse their child about right and wrong behaviour. Parents are their child's moral guardians and have the right to challenge any information that is not suitable
A child loves pretend play, and likes to play in different roles e.g. girls like Rapunzel-like characters, but this does not mean they will remain in that role. They will move on and see that as part of their younger self which they leave behind. Reinforcing these will stifle the child's ability to mature into adult roles
So-called age-appropriate learning about sexuality can border on grooming, which may cause the child to be vulnerable to those who would harm them because they do not realise that their behaviour opens them up to abuse
Early sexual knowledge is linked to grooming and abuse can lead to depression, suicidal tendencies and psychiatric illnesses in adulthood
Therefore, parents, as protectors, who provide safe, stable homes, where children feel secure, should be the only providers of sexual information when a child reaches puberty and not before that event.
Re-Examining the Evidence for School-based Comprehensive Sex Education: A Global Research Review
“Re-Examining the Evidence for School-based Comprehensive Sex Education: A Global Research Review”, found that globally only 6% of the 103 studies on RSE programmes found any positive evidence of effectiveness, and showed that, overall, there is more evidence of harm than of positive outcomes from such programmes. They found 87% of RSE had failed in its primary purpose and 16% of worldwide programmes were shown to cause harm, including such things as a decrease in condom use, combined with an increase in sexual activity, of partners, oral sex, forced sex, STDs and pregnancies. The negative impact was even higher for programmes delivered in Africa, whereby 24% of the programmes were shown to have caused harm. Read the report at the Institute for Research and Evaluation.